Read the following article about Epicurus:
The
Ancient Greek philosopher Epicurus was born in 341 BC, on the island of Samos,
a few miles off the coast of modern Turkey. He had an unusually long beard,
wrote over three hundred books and was one of the most famous philosophers of
his age.
What made him famous was his skillful and relentless focus on one
particular subject: happiness. Previously, philosophers had wanted to know how
to be good; Epicurus insisted he wanted to focus on how to be happy.
Few philosophers had ever made such a frank, down-to-earth
admission of their interests before. It shocked many, especially when they
heard that Epicurus had started a School for Happiness. The idea of what was
going on inside was both entirely shocking and deeply titillating. A few
disgruntled Epicureans made some damaging leaks about what was going on in the
school. Timocrates said that Epicurus had to vomit twice a day because he spent
all his time on a sofa being fed luxurious meats and fish by a team of slaves.
And Diotimus the Stoic published fifty lewd letters which he said had been
written by Epicurus to some young students when he’d been drunk and sexually
obsessed. It’s because of such gossip that we still sometimes now use the
adjective ‘Epicurean’ to describe luxury and decadence.
But such associations are unfounded. The truth about Epicurus is
far less sensational – but far more interesting. The Greek philosopher really
was focused on happiness and pleasure, but he had no interest in expensive
meals or orgies. He owned only two cloaks and lived on bread, olives and – as a
treat – the occasional slice of cheese. Instead, having patiently studied
happiness for many years, Epicurus came to a set of remarkable and
revolutionary conclusions about what we actually need to be happy, conclusions
wholly at odds with the assumptions of his age – and of our own.
Epicurus proposed that we typically make three mistakes when
thinking about happiness.
1. We think we need romantic relationships
Then, as now, people were obsessed with love. But Epicurus
observed that happiness and love (let alone marriage) almost never go together.
There is too much jealousy, misunderstanding and bitterness. Sex is always
complicated and rarely in harmony with affection. It would be best, Epicurus
concluded, never to put too much faith in relationships. By contrast, he noted
how rewarding most friendships are: here we are polite, we look for agreement,
we don’t scold or berate and we aren’t possessive. But the problem is we don’t
see our friends enough. We let work and family take precedence. We can’t find
the time. They live too far away.
2. We think we need lots of money
Then, as now, people were obsessed by their careers, motivated by
a desire for money and applause. But Epicurus emphasized the difficulties of
employment: the jealousy, the backbiting and frustrated ambitions.
What makes work really satisfying, Epicurus believed, is when
we’re able to work either alone or in very small groups and when it feels
meaningful, when we sense that we’re helping others in some way or making
things that improve the world. It isn’t really cash or prestige we want, it’s a
sense of fulfilment through our labour.
3. We put too much faith in luxury
We dream of luxury: a beautiful home, elegant rooms and pleasant
views. We imagine trips to idyllic locations, where we can rest and let others
look after us…
But Epicurus disagreed with our longings. Behind the fantasy of
luxury, what he believed we really want is calm. Yet calm won’t possibly arise
simply through changing the view or owning a delightful building.
Calm is an internal quality that is the result of analysis: it
comes when we sift through our worries and correctly understand them. We
therefore need ample time to read, to write, and most of all, to benefit from
the regular support of a good listener: a sympathetic, kind, clever person who
in Epicurus’s time would have been a philosopher, and whom we would now call a
therapist.
With his analysis of happiness in hand, Epicurus made three
important innovations:
- Firstly, he decided that he would live together with
friends. Enough of seeing them only now and then. He bought a modestly priced
plot of land outside of Athens and built a place where he and his friends could
live side by side on a permanent basis. Everyone had their rooms, and there
were common areas downstairs and in the grounds. That way, the residents would
always be surrounded by people who shared their outlooks, were entertaining and
kind. Children were looked after in rota. Everyone ate together. One could chat
in the corridors late at night. It was the world’s first proper commune.
- Secondly,
everyone in the commune stopped working for other people. They accepted cuts in
their income in return for being able to focus on fulfilling work. Some of
Epicurus’s friends devoted themselves to farming, others to cooking, a few to
making furniture and art. They had far less money, but ample intrinsic
satisfaction.
- And thirdly, Epicurus and his friends devoted themselves
to finding calm through rational analysis and insight. They spent periods of
every day reflecting on their anxieties, improving their understanding of their
psyches and mastering the great questions of philosophy.
Epicurus’s experiment in living caught on. Epicurean communities
opened up all around the Mediterranean and drew in thousands of followers. The
centers thrived for generations – until they were brutally suppressed by a
jealous and aggressive Christian Church in the 5th century. But even then,
their essence survived when many of them were turned into monasteries.
Epicurus’s influence continues into the modern age. Karl Marx did
his PhD thesis on him and thought of him as his favorite philosopher. What we
call Communism is at heart just a bigger – and rather more authoritarian and
joyless – version of Epicureanism.
Even
today, Epicurus remains an indispensable guide to life in advanced consumer
capitalist societies because advertising – on which this system is based –
functions on cleverly muddling people up about what they think they need to be
happy.
An extraordinary number of adverts focus on the three very things
that Epicurus identified as false lures of happiness: romantic love,
professional status and luxury.
Adverts wouldn’t work as well as they do if they didn’t operate
with an accurate sense of what our real needs are. Yet while they excite us by
evoking them, they refuse to quench them properly. Beer ads will show us groups
of friends hugging – but only sell us alcohol (that we might end up drinking
alone). Fancy watch ads will show us high-status professionals walking
purposefully to the office, but won’t know how to answer the desire for
intrinsically satisfying work. And adverts for tropical beaches may titillate
us with their serenity, but can’t – on their own – deliver the true calm we
crave
Epicurus invites us to change our understanding of ourselves and
to alter society accordingly. We mustn’t exhaust ourselves and the planet in a
race for things that wouldn’t possibly satisfy us even if we got them. We need
a return to philosophy and a lot more seriousness about the business of being
happy.
Answered the following questions:
Students read each of Epicurus’ “mistakes of happiness”
For each one, answer if this is something you raised your hand to.
If “Yes,” explain why you think so, despite what Epicurus says.
If “No,” explain if your reason is similar to Epicurus’ reason or
different.
Read what he did-
Bought a home where all his friends could live together.
Would you do this? What are the pros? Cons?
Work for yourself, not for money/others. Only do what makes you happy
even if you are poor.
Would you be willing to work for much less money (just enough to get
by) if it meant that your work was exciting/fulfilling?
What would you do for work if this was an option?
I’ll finish reading the rest.
Students spend 15-20 minutes writing their thoughts on Epicurus’
philosophy. Do they agree? Disagree? Why? What parts did he get right? What
parts did he get wrong?
