Friday, February 27, 2015

February 27- Epicurus

We read an article on the philosopher, Epicurus. Then answered the following questions:

For each of Epicurus' mistakes of happiness, write if you agree with him or not. Then explain your answer.


The Ancient Greek philosopher Epicurus was born in 341 BC, on the island of Samos, a few miles off the coast of modern Turkey. He had an unusually long beard, wrote over three hundred books and was one of the most famous philosophers of his age. 
What made him famous was his skillful and relentless focus on one particular subject: happiness. Previously, philosophers had wanted to know how to be good; Epicurus insisted he wanted to focus on how to be happy.
Few philosophers had ever made such a frank, down-to-earth admission of their interests before. It shocked many, especially when they heard that Epicurus had started a School for Happiness. The idea of what was going on inside was both entirely shocking and deeply titillating. A few disgruntled Epicureans made some damaging leaks about what was going on in the school. Timocrates said that Epicurus had to vomit twice a day because he spent all his time on a sofa being fed luxurious meats and fish by a team of slaves. And Diotimus the Stoic published fifty lewd letters which he said had been written by Epicurus to some young students when he’d been drunk and sexually obsessed. It’s because of such gossip that we still sometimes now use the adjective ‘Epicurean’ to describe luxury and decadence.
But such associations are unfounded. The truth about Epicurus is far less sensational – but far more interesting. The Greek philosopher really was focused on happiness and pleasure, but he had no interest in expensive meals or orgies. He owned only two cloaks and lived on bread, olives and – as a treat – the occasional slice of cheese. Instead, having patiently studied happiness for many years, Epicurus came to a set of remarkable and revolutionary conclusions about what we actually need to be happy, conclusions wholly at odds with the assumptions of his age – and of our own.
Epicurus proposed that we typically make three mistakes when thinking about happiness.
1. We think we need romantic relationships 
Then, as now, people were obsessed with love. But Epicurus observed that happiness and love (let alone marriage) almost never go together. There is too much jealousy, misunderstanding and bitterness. Sex is always complicated and rarely in harmony with affection. It would be best, Epicurus concluded, never to put too much faith in relationships. By contrast, he noted how rewarding most friendships are: here we are polite, we look for agreement, we don’t scold or berate and we aren’t possessive. But the problem is we don’t see our friends enough. We let work and family take precedence. We can’t find the time. They live too far away. 
2. We think we need lots of money
Then, as now, people were obsessed by their careers, motivated by a desire for money and applause. But Epicurus emphasized the difficulties of employment: the jealousy, the backbiting and frustrated ambitions.
What makes work really satisfying, Epicurus believed, is when we’re able to work either alone or in very small groups and when it feels meaningful, when we sense that we’re helping others in some way or making things that improve the world. It isn’t really cash or prestige we want, it’s a sense of fulfilment through our labour. 
3. We put too much faith in luxury 
We dream of luxury: a beautiful home, elegant rooms and pleasant views. We imagine trips to idyllic locations, where we can rest and let others look after us…
But Epicurus disagreed with our longings. Behind the fantasy of luxury, what he believed we really want is calm. Yet calm won’t possibly arise simply through changing the view or owning a delightful building.
Calm is an internal quality that is the result of analysis: it comes when we sift through our worries and correctly understand them. We therefore need ample time to read, to write, and most of all, to benefit from the regular support of a good listener: a sympathetic, kind, clever person who in Epicurus’s time would have been a philosopher, and whom we would now call a therapist.
With his analysis of happiness in hand, Epicurus made three important innovations:

- Firstly, he decided that he would live together with friends. Enough of seeing them only now and then. He bought a modestly priced plot of land outside of Athens and built a place where he and his friends could live side by side on a permanent basis. Everyone had their rooms, and there were common areas downstairs and in the grounds. That way, the residents would always be surrounded by people who shared their outlooks, were entertaining and kind. Children were looked after in rota. Everyone ate together. One could chat in the corridors late at night. It was the world’s first proper commune.
- Secondly, everyone in the commune stopped working for other people. They accepted cuts in their income in return for being able to focus on fulfilling work. Some of Epicurus’s friends devoted themselves to farming, others to cooking, a few to making furniture and art. They had far less money, but ample intrinsic satisfaction.
- And thirdly, Epicurus and his friends devoted themselves to finding calm through rational analysis and insight. They spent periods of every day reflecting on their anxieties, improving their understanding of their psyches and mastering the great questions of philosophy.
Epicurus’s experiment in living caught on. Epicurean communities opened up all around the Mediterranean and drew in thousands of followers. The centers thrived for generations – until they were brutally suppressed by a jealous and aggressive Christian Church in the 5th century. But even then, their essence survived when many of them were turned into monasteries.
Epicurus’s influence continues into the modern age. Karl Marx did his PhD thesis on him and thought of him as his favorite philosopher. What we call Communism is at heart just a bigger – and rather more authoritarian and joyless – version of Epicureanism.
Even today, Epicurus remains an indispensable guide to life in advanced consumer capitalist societies because advertising – on which this system is based – functions on cleverly muddling people up about what they think they need to be happy. 
An extraordinary number of adverts focus on the three very things that Epicurus identified as false lures of happiness: romantic love, professional status and luxury.
Adverts wouldn’t work as well as they do if they didn’t operate with an accurate sense of what our real needs are. Yet while they excite us by evoking them, they refuse to quench them properly. Beer ads will show us groups of friends hugging – but only sell us alcohol (that we might end up drinking alone). Fancy watch ads will show us high-status professionals walking purposefully to the office, but won’t know how to answer the desire for intrinsically satisfying work. And adverts for tropical beaches may titillate us with their serenity, but can’t – on their own – deliver the true calm we crave

Epicurus invites us to change our understanding of ourselves and to alter society accordingly. We mustn’t exhaust ourselves and the planet in a race for things that wouldn’t possibly satisfy us even if we got them. We need a return to philosophy and a lot more seriousness about the business of being happy.

Thursday, February 26, 2015

February 26- Karma vs. luck

We wrote what we've been doing for our happiness/productivity goals.

We also read the following article and answered the questions:

I need everyone to stop mixing up karma and luck. Right now.

By doing it, you’re giving luck way too much credit. And it pisses me off that luck gets any credit at all when it’s just that: luck. Maybe it’s because people don’t see the difference.

Here’s an example to help you out. People say I’m lucky. And I don’t disagree. I am lucky to a certain extent. Luck is the fact that I was born in the Soviet Union during a time when people were able to get out. Actions were taken that led to that opportunity, but connecting the dots that lead to me specifically is nearly impossible. That’s luck.

When I can actually piece together how something happened, that’s karma. I wrote an article for someone or I appeared on someone’s show and now I’m seeing enormous benefits. I introduced that friend to the person who got them their dream job and now my friend wants to do something in return. Karma.

See the difference? The very definition of karma implies that some kind of work on your end is needed, but luck? Luck just happens.

I’m not a person who believes it is 100% one or the other in life. Both exist, but people seem to give credit to luck more often and point out that people are lucky. But I think that’s a symptom of people not wanting to put the hours in, to work hard. Luck is easy. Luck requires no effort. Karma takes work, real hustle, real drive.

There is a cynicism towards hard work that seems to emerge a lot in our world. People don’t want to admit that maybe they have to put in extra hours, stay up late, give up TV binge watching, and WORK. It’s easy for you to say I’m lucky, but does luck have anything to do with the fact that I’m writing this at 7pm on a Sunday?

I didn’t think so.

Now the question becomes: how do you make yourself more about karma, and less about luck?

It’s a very simple mindset: do things for free, with no expectations of what you might get in return. People are stuck and captivated by the idea that every action must have a return of investment. If you’re behaving in that sense, you don’t get it. Sometimes it pays to just do something awesome. For yourself, for someone else. Whichever. Just take action.

And pay attention. Because you’ll start seeing a couple things. One, karma is real. And two, luck has nothing to do with it.





Name: ________________________

In your own words, explain the difference between luck and karma







List two ways in which you are lucky.

1.


2.


List two ways in which you have given yourself good karma

1.


2.


Think of something that is coming up soon for you. Explain how luck can help you through it. Then explain how karma can help you through it

Luck:




Karma:





The author talks about working hard and getting GOOD karma. But what about BAD karma? Describe a situation that would be the result of BAD karma.

Wednesday, February 25, 2015

February 25-Theme paper

Today we wrote went to the computer lab and wrote a short paper on theme in the movie, Smoke Signals. Here was the outline for it.

What is the message from the movie Smoke Signals?

Your paper will be….
3 paragraphs (at least)

Things to include in your paper:

·     A thesis statement
       (There are many messages in Smoke Signals, but one that stands out is…)
·      At least two specific examples from the movie to support your thesis
·     A conclusion which includes:
                Things that you thought were interesting

Final thoughts or questions you may have

Monday, February 23, 2015

February 24- Pictures of Theme

Open up a Google doc:

Copy the rest of this blog onto the google doc and begin completing it. When finished, make sure to share with me.

Brainstorm three possible themes from Smoke Signals
1.
2.
3.

Now get three ideas from other people in the class
1.
2.

3.

Now pick one theme that you would like to focus on... What is it?


Lastly- find three pictures from anywhere on the internet that show somehow represent the theme you picked. Copy them onto your doc. Explain how each picture helps explain your theme. Make sure this is specific to the theme as the movie explains it!

EX: If I picked the theme, "Hiding", I might use the following picture.

 Image result for escaping
Now I need to explain how this picture represents the theme and relate it to the movie.

I choose this picture to represent Arnold Joseph (the dad). He is trying to turn away and hide from the faces. The faces represent the parents of Thomas' parents who died in the fire.

Friday, February 20, 2015

February 20- questions for Jesus Christ's half-brother

As we read the story, we answered the following questions:

Questions for Jesus

What do you think this is going to be about?
Read 1966. 
Discuss POV.  Discuss who might be Jesus.

Read 1967.  Point out the long sentence at the end.  What does having a long sentence like that do to a story? 

Read the second 1967.  Talk about responsibilities.  Ask the students if they have any responsibilities.  Responsibilities include:
Taking care of yourself
Taking care of others in your family or friends
Taking care of your schoolwork
Taking care of your family/cultural traditions

What is your future like?

Who is the hero in this story?
What has he done that is heroic?
What has he done that is not heroic?

How are beer and books the best defense?

Who is the hero in this story?

What has he done that is heroic?

Tuesday, February 17, 2015

February 18

We began reading another story from Sherman Alexie. We will finish it tomorrow.

Be sure to bring a book for independent reading!

Monday, February 16, 2015

February 17- Childhood Friend

Today we wrote the a 200-word response to the following prompt:

write 200 words on
a childhood friend, girl/boyfriend, relative, animal, enemy, confidant that you had a long time ago: How was this person special? Can you tell me a memory or the two of you? Spend time describing it. You may embellish it if you’d like. Add quotes that you probably had instead of worrying too much about ones you actually had. 

We also discussed a list I handed out that had 52 tips for happiness and productivity... Students picked one to try for this week. We will write about it at the end of the week.

Friday, February 13, 2015

February 13- Phoenix, AZ

We read a short story, "This is what it means to say Phoenix, AZ". Once finished,

·         Answer these questions in 4-5 sentences
·         Explain why other kids hate Thomas
·         Why aren’t Thomas and Victor going to be friends?

·         What is the author’s message?

Thursday, February 12, 2015

February 12-100 words on Plato

Today we finished reading the book.

We also spent a little more time talking and thinking about Plato. Students picked one of his four sections (Think Harder, Love More Wisely, Importance of Beauty, Change Society) and wrote 100 words on how this is or isn't a part of their life.

Wednesday, February 11, 2015

February 11 Lessons from our elders

We read to page 196 in our books.

We also discussed lessons we've learned from our elders. Students each wrote five lessons they've learned from their elders and shared with the class.

Then students wrote a 100-word story that has one of those lessons as a moral.

Monday, February 9, 2015

February 9- Plato

Today we read pages 159-178 and then read a packet about Plato. For each of Plato's four central ideas, students wrote what they thought was true about it and what they disagreed with.

The Great Philosophers 1: Plato

  1024px-Akropolis_by_Leo_von_Klenze
Athens, 2400 years ago. It’s a compact place: around 250,000 people live here. There are fine baths, theatres, temples, shopping arcades and gymnasiums. Art is flourishing, and science too. You can pick up excellent fish down at the harbor in Piraeus. It’s warm for more than half the year.
This is also home to the world’s first true – and probably greatest – philosopher: Plato.
Born into a prominent and wealthy family in the city, Plato devoted his life to one goal: helping people to reach a state of what he termed:
               εὐδαιμονία
Eudaimonia: this peculiar but fascinating Greek word is a little hard to translate: it almost means ‘happiness’ but is really closer to ‘fulfillment’, because ‘happiness’ suggests continuous chirpiness – whereas ‘fulfilment’ is more compatible with periods of great pain and suffering – which seem to be an unavoidable part even of a good life.
How did Plato propose to make people more fulfilled? Four central ideas stand out in his work.
 Think harder
Plato proposed that our lives go wrong in large part because we almost never give ourselves time to think carefully and logically enough about our plans. And so we end up with the wrong values, careers and relationships. Plato wanted to bring order and clarity to our minds.
He observed how many of our ideas are derived from what the crowd thinks, from what the Greeks called ‘doxa’, and we’d call ‘common-sense’. And yet repeatedly, across the 36 books he wrote, Plato showed this common-sense to be riddled with errors, prejudice and superstition. Popular ideas about love, fame, money or goodness simply don’t stand up to reason.
Plato also noticed how proud people were about being led by their instincts or passions (jumping into decisions on the basis of nothing more than ‘how they felt’), and he compared this to being dragged dangerously along by a group of blindfolded wild horses.
As Freud was happy to acknowledge, Plato was the inventor of therapy, insisting that we learn to submit all our thoughts and feelings to reason. As he repeatedly wrote, the essence of philosophy came down to the command to:
γνῶθι σεαυτόν
‘Know yourself.’

2. Love More Wisely
symposiumPlato is one of the great theorists of relationships. His book, The Symposium, is an attempt to explain what love really is. It tells the story of a dinner party given by Agathon, a handsome poet, who invites a group of his friends around to eat, drink and talk about love.

The guests all have different views about what love is. Plato gives his old friend Socrates – one of the main characters in this and all his books – the most useful and interesting theory. It goes like this: when you fall in love, what’s really going on is that you have seen in another person some good quality which you haven’t got. Perhaps they are calm, when you get agitated; or they are self-disciplined, while you’re all over the place; or they are eloquent when you are tongue-tied.
The underlying fantasy of love is that by getting close to this person, you can become a little like they are. They can help you to grow to your full potential.
In Plato’s eyes, love is in essence a kind of education: you couldn’t really love someone if you didn’t want to be improved by them. Love should be two people trying to grow together – and helping each other to do so. Which means you need to get together with the person who contains a key missing bit of your evolution: the virtues you don’t have.
This sounds entirely odd nowadays when we tend to interpret love as finding someone perfect just as they are. In the heat of arguments, lovers sometimes say to one another: ‘If you loved me, you wouldn’t try to change me.’
Plato thinks the diametric opposite. He wants us to enter relationships in a far less combative and proud way. We should accept that we are not complete and allow our lovers to teach us things. A good relationship has to mean we won’t love the other person exactly as they are. It means committing to helping them become a better version of themselves – and to endure the stormy passages this inevitably involves – while also not resisting their attempts to improve us.
beauty
3. The Importance of beauty
Everyone – pretty much – likes beautiful things. But we tend to think of them as a bit mysterious in their power over us and, in the greater scheme, not terribly important.
But Plato proposed that it really matters what sorts of houses or temples, pots or sculptures you have around you.
No one before Plato had asked the key question: why do we like beautiful things? He found a fascinating reason: we recognize in them a part of ‘the good’.
There are lots of good things we aspire to be: kind, gentle, harmonious, balanced, peaceful, strong, dignified. These are qualities in people. But they are also qualities in objects. We get moved and excited when we find in objects the qualities we need but are missing in our lives.
Beautiful objects therefore have a really important function. They invite us to evolve in their direction, to become as they are. Beauty can educate our souls.
It follows that ugliness is a serious matter too, for it parades dangerous and damaged characteristics in front of us. It encourages us to be like it: harsh, chaotic, brash. It makes it that much harder to be wise, kind and calm.
Plato sees art as therapeutic: it is the duty of poets and painters (and nowadays, novelists, television producers and designers) to help us live good lives.
Plato believed in the censorship of the arts. It’s not the paradox it seems. If artists can help us live well, they can, unfortunately, equally give prestige and glamour to unhelpful attitudes and ideas. Just being an artist doesn’t guarantee the power of art will be wisely used.
That’s why Plato believed that artists should work under the command of philosophers, who would give them the right ideas and ask them to make these convincing and popular. Art was to be a sort of propaganda – or advertising – for the good.
4. Changing society
Plato spent a lot of time thinking how the government and society should ideally be. He was the world’s first utopian thinker.
In this, he was inspired by Athens’s great rival: Sparta. This was a city-sized machine for turning out great soldiers. Everything the Spartans did – how they raised their children, how their economy was organised, whom they admired, how they had sex, what they ate – was tailored to that one goal. And Sparta was hugely successful, from a military point of view.
640px-Young_Spartans_National_Gallery_NG3860
But that wasn’t Plato’s concern. He wanted to know: how could a society get better at producing not military power but eudaimonia? How could it reliably help people towards fulfillment?
In his book, The Republic, Plato identifies a number of changes that should be made:
a) We need new heroes
Athenian society was very focused on the rich, like the louche aristocrat Alcibiades, and sports celebrities, like the boxer Milo of Croton. Plato wasn’t impressed: it really matters who we admire, for celebrities influence our outlook, ideas and conduct. And bad heroes give glamour to flaws of character.
Plato therefore wanted to give Athens new celebrities, replacing the current crop with ideally wise and good people he called Guardians: models for everyone’s good development. These people would be distinguished by their record of public service, their modesty and simple habits, their dislike of the limelight and their wide and deep experience. They would be the most honored and admired people in society.
b) We need censorship
Today censorship makes us anxious. But Plato was worried about the wrong sort of freedom: Athens was a free-for-all for the worst opinion-sellers. Crazy religious notions and sweet sounding, but dangerous, ideas sucked up mass enthusiasm and lead Athens to disastrous governments and misguided wars (like a fateful attack on Sparta).
Discurso_funebre_pericles
Continuous exposure to a storm of confused voices was – Plato thought – seriously bad for us, so he wanted to limit the activities of public orators and dangerous preachers. He would – nowadays – have been very skeptical about the power of mass media.

c) Better Education
Plato believed passionately in education, but wanted to refocus the curriculum. The primary thing we need to learn is not just math or spelling, but how to be good: we need to learn about courage, self-control, reasonableness, independence and calm.
To put this into practice, Plato founded a school called The Academy in Athens, which flourished for over 400 years. You went there to learn nothing less than how to live and die well.
platoacademy
It’s fascinating and not a little sad how modern academic institutions have outlawed this ambition. If a student showed up at Oxford or Harvard universities today seeking to be taught how to live, the professors would call the police – or the insane asylum.
d) Better Childhoods
Families try their best. And sometimes children strike lucky. Their parents are well balanced, good teachers, reliably mature and wise. But pretty often parents transmit their confusions and failings to their children.
Plato thought that bringing up children well was one of the most difficult (and most needed) skills. He was acutely sympathetic to the child who is held back by the wrong home environment.

So he proposed that many children would in fact be better off if they could take their vision of life not from their parents but from wise guardians, paid for by the state. He proposed that a sizeable share of the next generation would be brought up by people more qualified than their own parents.

Thursday, February 5, 2015

Feb 5- reflection and theme of diary

First we reflected on our independent homework and answered the following:

Reflection on Independent Homework
What are you going to do?
What are three obstacles to getting it done?
How will you overcome each obstacle?
What do you hope to get out of this homework?

Then we free-wrote for 10 minutes on what we thought the theme in Absolutely True Diary of a Part-Time Indian was.

We also read to page 158

Wednesday, February 4, 2015

February 4- superhero article

We discussed superheroes and powers for a bit and then read the following article.

Bam! Pow! Superhero Groups Clash In an Epic Battle of Good vs. Good

Wall Street Journal
FEBRUARY 25, 2011
By ASHBY JONES
SEATTLE—Life isn't easy for the self-proclaimed superhero who calls himself "Phoenix Jones, Guardian of Seattle." A 22-year-old day-care worker by day, he dons a black-and-gold costume by night to harass drug dealers and break up street fights.
But he's having a harder time dealing with his latest nemeses: members of the "Real Life Superhero" (RLSH) movement.
This world-wide collection mainly of grown men with names like Zetaman, Knight Owl, Dark Guardian, and Mr. Raven Blade, have taken to grumbling about Mr. Jones, who has recently been getting more publicity than they do, partly because of his aggressive style.
The RLSHers, many of whom stick to charitable works like delivering food to the homeless, are concerned that Mr. Jones's physical approach might not reflect well on the superhero community, which has worked hard to convince people that it isn't just a group of comic-book geeks with inflated notions of their own importance but, rather, a force for good in the world.
"For the first time, we have someone who agrees with our overall purpose but doesn't agree with our methods," says Knight Owl, a Portland, Ore., member of the RLSH world who, like the others, refuses to give out his real name.
"I suppose it was bound to happen, but it's definitely a growing pain within the community."
Mr. Jones, who declined to allow his real name to be published but whose back story checks out, dismisses the criticism. "I may be eccentric, but I'm not crazy," he says. "I really am here to help the people of Seattle."
Real Life Superheroes, who seem to favor masks and dark clothing—sometimes emblazoned with homemade logos (like the Superman "S")—exist in pockets all over the world. Some, like Knight Owl and Thanatos, based in Vancouver, British Columbia, typically focus on charitable activities.
Others, such as New York's Dark Guardian, patrol areas known for drug activity—a bit like the city's old subway-riding Guardian Angels. Dark Guardian shines lights and takes videos to try to deter crime nonviolently, and he makes emergency calls to 911.
"Mostly, they're relatively normal people trying to help out and have a little fun along the way," says Tea Krulos, a Milwaukee writer working on a book about them.
Phoenix Jones is different. In the 10 months since he became prominent, he has shown a willingness to thrust himself into dangerous situations.
A mixed martial-arts fighter, he broke his nose last month while breaking up a fight, and he says he has been shot and stabbed, too. He often travels with a posse, sometimes carries a Taser nightstick and tear gas, and repeatedly has himself been mistaken for a criminal.
One Friday night, Mr. Jones and several sidekicks—two quiet men called Buster Doe and Pitch Black; a young woman named Blue Sparrow; and a superhero-in-training called Ski Man—spent several hours making the rounds on the streets of Seattle.
Mr. Jones posed for the occasional cellphone photo with revelers outside night spots in several popular neighborhoods. But, he says, the attention "distracts me from my mission."
Outside a bar, Mr. Jones chastised a man for yelling at a downtrodden passerby.
"Let's keep it cool; let's all have a good night," he said to the man, who quickly backed down.
From there, Mr. Jones chatted up late-night loiterers in areas known for drug dealing. "Stay safe tonight," he said. "Stay warm."
Later, the superheroes ran after a swerving car, suspecting a drunk driver, but the car raced away and, alas, they can't fly. Capes, also, are unfashionable in the superhero world: "They get caught on everything," says Mr. Raven Blade.
Little crime-fighting took place that night. "That's the thing," concedes Mr. Jones. "When there's nothing going on, you feel pretty silly in this outfit," he says, referring to his costume, which he says is equipped with the latest body armor.
Detective Mark Jamieson, spokesman for the Seattle Police Department, applauds citizens' willingness to get involved in their communities and says the department has received 911 calls from Mr. Jones.
But he worries about things getting out of hand. "Our concern is that if it goes badly, then we wind up getting called anyway, and we may get additional victims."
It's that kind of scenario that frightens other RLSHers.
"Whether intentionally or not, he's representing the [superhero] community now," says Knight Owl. "And that makes some people nervous."
Mr. Jones says the RLSH group initially resented his quick move into the spotlight, and blackballed him when he later tried to make nice. So Mr. Jones ultimately started his own group, called the Rain City Superheroes. He says the group's mission is decidedly different from the agenda of the RLSH gang.
"Handing out food to the homeless is an entirely worthy thing to do," he says. "But it's not what superheroes do. If you're going to drive a fire truck, people are going to expect you to put out fires. If you dress up like a superhero, people are going to expect you to fight crime."
Last month, in an effort to patch things up, members of the two groups met up in Seattle and went on a late-night patrol of the city.
According to Mr. Jones and others present, the night didn't go entirely smoothly. At a coffee shop following the patrol, Mr. Jones and Zetaman, a Portland superhero, argued over Mr. Jones's approach. Zetaman declined to comment. But on his blog, he recounted telling Mr. Jones: "[A]ll of us are afraid of one day someone is going to get killed and it'll be all over."
Added Zetaman: "I don't need this kind of macho c— in my life and I don't need to prove myself to anyone, least of all to Phoenix Jones and his Rain City Superhero Movement."
The night of the patrol, Zetaman left the group early and went back to his hotel.
Responds Mr. Jones: "I don't see the point in handing sandwiches to homeless people in areas in which the homeless are getting abused, attacked, harassed by drug dealers."
Since then, the two groups—the Rain City Superheroes and the Real Life Superheroes—have pretty much gone their separate ways.
"We're not one giant family," says Knight Owl. "After all, we're a colorful collection of individuals. We're superheroes."









1.      Have you ever thought of becoming a crime-fighting superhero like those described in this article?


2.       Do people want heroes or superheroes, or are they threatened by them?


3.      What do you think about Dark Guardian’s approach? Are there situations in which he might have to become violent?


4.      If you saw someone beating another person, would you intervene? How?


5.      How do the two groups described in this article define the concept of a superhero? Why is it important to each that its definition prevail?


6.      What is Zetaman’s attitude toward superheroes? Why did he become one, rather than being a traditional charity worker?




7.       Zetaman says he isn’t trying to prove himself to anyone, least of all Phoenix Jones. Is he right? Do you agree? Explain yourself.


Read to page 129 in Absolutely True Diary

Tuesday, February 3, 2015

February 3- two questions

We started with talking about internal and external expectations. Students wrote on the following:

1.    How do internal and external expectations manifest themselves in our lives? 

2.
    Should a person’s responsibility to their family, tribe, or community take precedence over their individual goals? 

25-50 words each.

Then we read to page 100

Monday, February 2, 2015

February 2

We talked today quite a bit about expectations- both internal and external.


Individually search through the book for examples of internal and external expectations on Junior. 
 Write down at least 3-4 each. Include page numbers.
 Internal expectation...Junior saying something positive or negative about who he is as a boy or as an indian.  
External expectation... Someone else judging Junior either positively or negatively about who he is as a boy or an indian.

Once finished, we will share with each other to get a list of 7-10 of each.

Create an adult junior. Complete with job, family, and friends (or lack of those things). 
  You can do this by:
·                     Writing a narrative (Junior, now 28, sits on his front porch...)
·                     Write a newspaper article of something great or horrible that he did to get in the news (Yesterday, at 9 o'clock at night, a young man broke into a convenience store...)
·                     A letter or series of letters between Junior and a girlfriend, partner, parents, kid, baby-momma?
·                     Another idea?

  Either way, this will be about 200-300 words.